<br>Except there is something wrong with that, because you're splitting apart a complete sentence and thus changing the context.<p>I didn't split it for my convenience, I used the ONE LINE in the opening that says the GL died.<p>There is nothing wrong with that. That sentense can stand alone by itself.
<br>No, it can't.<p>Oh wait, it can't? God..
<br>I do it all the time? Feel free to give an example. Religious people do it all the time? What does religion have to do with any of this?<p>You people do it all the time, religious people do it all the time.
<br>Except for the fact that "The victor sacrificed" is not a complete sentence. There's no punctuation at the end, because there are more words left.<p>[quote]Sheesh.. I grow tired of arguing with people who look for fights.. </blockquote><br>And I grow tired of you throwing in totally irrelevant crap into these debates and throwing a temper tantrum if anyone dares to challenge your opinion. The only one that has been doing any name-calling in this thread so far, is you.The words below and above it, have no bearing on that sentence.
<br>And in such a case, I would agree with what you said. But since the game does NOT have a comma, semicolon, or any other form of punctuation aside from a period at the end of the sentence, my statement still stands.<p>The victor sacrificed, the vanquished to the heavens.<p>Can work as a sentence in English. Authors do it all the time.
<br>I do? Funny, I understood the inheritance part just fine. Le Roof inherited the Great Light's will. Fantastic. Doesn't mean the Great Light is dead.<p>You fail to see that Le Roof is to the GL ad the GL is to Rune.
<br>"Mike Ripplinger" beliefs? Care to explain what that's supposed to mean?<p>I'm tired of you disregarding facts, just to spur your little Mike RIpp beliefs.
<br>You had to cut a sentence in half for one source, and the other is editor notes by Rebecca Capowski. This is your idea of canonical sources?<p>You have 2 canonical sources that say the same damn thing.
<br>Which has any relevance to this discussion, how? When the hell did I say anything about Rune acknowledging the whole Lutz thing? You keep throwing random crap at me that has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on this discussion.You also fail to see that RUNE doesn't consider himself LUTZ, when he really IS LUTZ.<p>Le Roof can't do the same?<p>Double standards.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests