by LaconianShot » Sun Apr 10, 2005 4:05 am
<blockquote>I love it when people say things like "your in over your head' so much fun to prove you wrong, you challenged me, you will learn from your mistake.</blockquote> <br>I'm sorry, but your "arguement" didn't have a lot of substance. You backed down on the central issues, prefering to debate purely subjective points of views, and doing a poor job at even that. <br><blockquote>Responding and countering are the same basic thing, you knew what I meant and if you didn't you grossly underestimate me, which you wont for long.</blockquote> <br>Not at all. A response covers a wide range of things, but is in general, simply a reply. A counter implies a rebuttal of a point in this context. Grossly underestimate you? I think not. You simply give yourself far too much credit. <br><blockquote>I wasn't really avoiding anything I was merely giving you a choice, you made it and now you suffer the coniquences, truth be told I don't like to have to argue with people like yourself it really just gets boring after awhile</blockquote> <br>Right. You're above this, correct? You're far too intelligent, yes? I hate to disillusion you, but you're not a very adequate debater. Again, this arrogance complex is really becoming annoying. It does not suit someone who is obviously none of the things he claims to be. No, you're not the greatest debater ever to grace this board.<br><blockquote> Perhaps, however in the context were talking about which is how do we think the PS4 character will look like it does have a lot to do with it, </blockquote> <br>...except that that's not the context we were arguing in. True, it's in that topic. However, you used your point of supposedly memorizing the cutscenes to try to prove that you were the "biggest fan". So... you messed the context up. Good try though, master debater.<br> <blockquote> Again I'm not trying to prove anything, even a fool wouldn't admit to something so stupid, I don't think you even can, which is one thing that makes me much more interesting then you will ever be.</blockquote> <br>Such a high opinion of yourself! Whether you admit it or not, you're trying to prove something to people on this board... not only with your foolish claim, but with your attempted hard-ass, intelligent facade. Thankfully, nobody's buying it.<br><blockquote>I haven't said that I was the biggest fan I said I'm prob. the most obessed with it,</blockquote> <br>Really? Because this says contrary:<br><blockquote>-I'm prob. the biggest PS4 nut on this board.<br>-although I still do think I'm a bigger fan, </blockquote> <br>One claim from early on, another claim from the above's same sentence, no less. We'll let your stupidity rest with this, though.<br><blockquote>Oppions differ in this case and I think you don't see past anyones opinion but your own,</blockquote> <br>Actually, there's only two "oppions" here- mine and yours. Yours is ill-formed and close-minded, and will cause you a lot of grief, whereas mine is open-minded and will likely give me a lot of joy. If you're glued to the monitor, you will miss many things worthwhile. If you think that only intelligent people hang around online (but strangely contradict yourself and talk down to them), then you will miss a lot of people and experiences in real life that are worth so much more.<br><blockquote> If I was trying to prove anything I would have backed up claims, I simply don't like to be challenged by fools thats all, which is the only reason I bother to respond to you right now. </blockquote> <br>Even when you were <b>trying</b> to prove your points you didn't back them up. Master GM the Almighty Phan doesn't like to back things up.<br><blockquote>I can prove that your not the next pope becuase there is something called the 'days of mourning' for the former pope before they elect the new one,</blockquote> <br>Great... except that I didn't say I was Pope, I said that I was up for election, which would imply that I'm a Cardinal (oops, Almighty Intelligent GM missed that implication). Of course, it's not true, but you can't prove otherwise.<br><blockquote>perhaps you are a cardinal however if you were I would have to wonder, don't you have some false god to pray to to hope your salvation will happen rather then have a discussion with someone much more intelligent and arrogent then you are?</blockquote> <br>As Siren said, cynicism is often mistaken for intelligence. I suppose Almighty Intelligent GM can prove that there's no God now, right? You're <i>that</i> smart, correct? Don't make me laugh. I won't even bother to engage in a complex theological discussion with you, because you've <b>already</b> proven that your views are ignorant and uneducated. I'm sure that "false god" thing was an attempt to aid your failing hard-ass image. I assure you, nobody shares that view.<br><blockquote> My word is all that I need, as I said before I don't really care to prove anything to you, no matter how you may think I do.</blockquote> <br>I'm sorry, but in a <b>debate</b>, you <b>need</b> to provide facts. That's the point of a debate!<br><blockquote>Meh, this was so damn boring, if your going to comment again I'm asking you nicely come up with something worth responding to</blockquote> <br>Again with the facade. Give it up... you're not intelligent, you're not tough, you're not even a competent debater... this persona that you're trying to create is becoming tiresome. I've got a suggestion for you: grow up, learn to type, form an intelligent opinionand <i>then</i> try this again.<br><blockquote>I'm 17</blockquote> <br>And that's truly sad. I'm sure there's plenty of members on this board younger then you that exhibit more maturity.<p>Well, that's a wrap. 4 people have cleaned your arguements, all in varying degrees. If my arguement alone is not adequate, in your [narrow minded, simplistic] views, then the other three people's arguements should suffice.